A forensic expert believes Princess Diana may have survived her ‘extremely uncommon’ fatal wounds.

More than 28 years have passed since the world grieved the loss of the People’s Princess in a horrific vehicle accident.

On August 31, 1997, the 36-year-old and her lover, Dodi Fayed, were attempting to evade the paparazzi in Paris when the collision happened.

It is reported that Princess Diana’s chauffeur, Henri Paul, lost control of the vehicle at the entrance to the Pont de l’Alma underpass and collided with another car before driving across the tunnel into a column at around 65 mph.

The collision killed all three, with only Trevor Rees-Jones, Dodi’s bodyguard, surviving the debris. Diana sadly got into cardiac arrest and died of internal hemorrhage caused by serious chest and lung injuries.

Now, renowned forensic pathologist Dr. Richard Shepherd claims she may have survived ‘if only’ a few life-saving procedures had been implemented before and immediately following the incident.

After reviewing the data in the case, the pathologist stated in his book Unnatural Causes, which will be released on April 18, that her precise damage, a microscopic rip in a vein in one of her lungs, was ‘so unusual’ that he had never seen it before in his career.

“Diana’s was a very small injury but in the wrong place,” stated the surgeon.

However, the doctor is eager to put conspiracy ideas to rest, noting that her death was ‘indisputable’ due to the damage she experienced.

However, he stated that Princess Diana’s death is a ‘perfect illustration’ of an ‘if only’ scenario, emphasizing that she most likely would have averted the awful injuries ‘if only’ she had worn a seatbelt.

Dr. Shepherd commented, “Had she been restrained, she would probably have appeared in public two days later with a black eye, perhaps a bit breathless from the fractured ribs, and with a broken arm in a sling.”

According to People, Mr. Rees-Jones, the solitary survivor, was the only passenger strapped up in the car, which likely helped absorb some of Diana’s crash force against the back of his seat.

Dr. Shepherd stated that another ‘if only’ is related to how she was seated;if she had hit his seat at a little different angle or at a slower pace, she could have lived.

The other ‘if only’ pertains to Diana’s hospital care, since she was not promptly transported in an ambulance despite being responsive.

In fact, her torn vein was oozing into her chest.

Firefighter Xavier Gourmelon, the first responder on the scene, said that he was unaware Diana had suffered ‘serious internal injuries.’

“To be honest, I assumed she’d live.” As far as I knew when she was in the ambulance, she was alive, and I expected her to live,” he told The Sun after learning Diana’s terrible final words.

A 2004 police probe looked into whether there were any suspicious circumstances or reasons to suspect that the fatalities were the result of an accident and concluded that it was a ‘tragic accident.’

Dr. Shepherd concurred with the inquiry’s findings, writing in his book, “The pathology of her death is, I feel, obvious. However, many more facts are woven around that tiny, deadly rip in a pulmonary vein, some of which are sufficiently obscure to allow a plethora of ideas to bloom.